Understanding the Difference Between In-Transit & PO Financing
Content
In today’s global trade environment, cash flow timing can make or break a business. Supply chains are longer, more complex, and increasingly unpredictable. According to the World Bank, the average duration for goods shipped internationally is 33 days door-to-door, with delays adding anywhere from 7–10 extra days due to port congestion, customs clearance, or logistics bottlenecks. At the same time, customer payment terms continue to stretch — a recent Atradius Payment Practices Barometer found that 49% of B2B invoices in North America are paid late, leaving businesses waiting even longer to get paid.
For companies trying to balance supplier payments, shipping costs, and customer receivables, these gaps can create serious strain. That’s where specialized financing solutions come in. Two common tools — In-Transit Financing and Purchase Order (PO) Financing — help businesses access liquidity at different stages of the supply chain. While they’re often confused, they address distinct needs.
Understanding the difference between the two can help businesses manage cash more effectively, seize growth opportunities, and keep goods flowing without interruption.
What is In-Transit Financing?
In-transit financing provides funding for goods already purchased and currently being shipped from the supplier to their destination. Instead of waiting until cargo arrives at a warehouse or distribution center, businesses can use in-transit financing to unlock the value of goods while they are still on the ocean, in the air, or on a truck.
Key points about in-transit financing:
- Covers the period between supplier shipment and goods arrival.
- Provides liquidity to pay operating costs, duties, tariffs, or other expenses.
- Helps importers manage long transit times and unpredictable shipping delays.
This solution is especially valuable for companies with extended supply chains, where goods may be in motion for weeks or months before becoming available for sale.
What is Purchase Order (PO) Financing?
PO financing, on the other hand, provides funding before goods are even purchased from the supplier. When a business receives a large order from a customer but lacks the upfront capital to fulfill it, PO financing covers the supplier costs associated with producing or acquiring the goods.
Key points about PO financing:
- Based on confirmed purchase orders from creditworthy customers.
- Provides funding to pay suppliers for production or procurement.
- Enables businesses to take on larger orders without straining working capital.
PO financing is ideal for growth-minded companies looking to seize opportunities without turning away large contracts due to lack of funds.
The Core Difference
The main distinction lies in timing within the supply chain:
- PO Financing helps fund goods before they’re produced or purchased.
- In-Transit Financing provides capital after goods are shipped but before they arrive.
Think of PO financing as the solution that makes a deal possible, and in-transit financing as the tool that keeps cash flowing while waiting for goods to land.
In-Transit vs. PO Financing: Key Differences
| Aspect | In-Transit Financing | Purchase Order (PO) Financing |
|---|---|---|
| Stage in Supply Chain | After goods have been shipped but before arrival | Before goods are purchased or produced |
| Purpose | Provides liquidity while goods are in motion | Funds supplier costs to fulfill a confirmed customer order |
| Trigger | Based on value of goods already in transit | Based on a verified purchase order from a creditworthy customer |
| Use of Funds | Cover operating costs, duties, tariffs, or working capital during transit delays | Pay suppliers for production or procurement of goods |
| Ideal For | Importers or businesses with long shipping timelines | Companies receiving large orders but lacking upfront capital |
| Risk Basis | Secured by goods already purchased and shipped | Secured by the creditworthiness of the end customer |
| Cash Flow Advantage | Access capital earlier in the shipping cycle | Take on larger orders without straining working capital |
Why the Difference Matters
Choosing between in-transit and PO financing depends on your business’s cash flow needs and stage of growth:
- Use PO financing if: you have orders in hand but lack upfront capital to pay suppliers.
- Use in-transit financing if: your goods are already en route, but you need liquidity before they can be delivered and sold.
Both solutions reduce working capital strain, improve flexibility, and help businesses manage longer payment cycles from customers.
Final Thoughts
The ability to access working capital at the right moment can be the difference between thriving and stalling in today’s competitive markets. Global supply chains are complex, and customer payment behaviors are unpredictable. Businesses that rely solely on traditional funding sources often find themselves constrained by rigid approval processes and timelines that don’t align with the speed of trade.
This is where solutions like in-transit financing and PO financing become powerful tools. They are designed to fill the liquidity gaps that banks often overlook — helping businesses stay agile, maintain momentum, and reduce the financial stress caused by delayed shipments or extended payment terms.
- PO financing empowers companies to accept larger orders and scale with confidence, without tying up internal resources.
- In-transit financing provides the bridge capital needed to cover expenses while waiting for goods to arrive, ensuring operations aren’t disrupted by cash flow shortages.
Used strategically, these financing solutions don’t just solve short-term cash flow problems — they create long-term advantages. By smoothing out liquidity cycles, businesses can negotiate better with suppliers, take on bigger opportunities, and build resilience against unexpected disruptions.
In fact, with 82% of business failures linked to poor cash flow management, companies that proactively adopt the right financing tools can position themselves ahead of competitors who remain constrained by traditional funding models. Whether you’re importing goods across continents or fulfilling growing customer demand at home, understanding and leveraging these options can transform uncertainty into opportunity.
The bottom line: smart financing isn’t just about covering costs — it’s about fueling growth, resilience, and competitive edge.
ABOUT eCapital
At eCapital, we accelerate business growth by delivering fast, flexible access to capital through cutting-edge technology and deep industry insight.
Across North America and the U.K., we’ve redefined how small and medium-sized businesses access funding—eliminating friction, speeding approvals, and empowering clients with access to the capital they need to move forward. With the capacity to fund facilities from $5 million to $250 million, we support a wide range of business needs at every stage.
With a powerful blend of innovation, scalability, and personalized service, we’re not just a funding provider, we’re a strategic partner built for what’s next.
Bruce Sayer
Bruce is a seasoned content creator with over 40 years of experience across various industries. Since 2013 he has been a dedicated member of the eCapital team, publishing informative articles intended to introduce and guide business leaders through effective financing options.
During this time, Bruce's articles have influenced countless of CEOs and other executives to investigate and often implement specialized funding strategies to achieve stable and flexible financial structures.
